“Being human signifies, for each one of us, belonging to a class, a society, a country, a continent, and a civilization . . . Claude Levi-Strauss
We’ve been thinking about leaders and followers. With the recent American election came the oft-repeated mantra of hope and change. This was articulated by some as the promise of a reunification of polarized elements within American society. Worthy objectives included a better relationship with other countries, and a collectivization of spirit that could be marshaled to do good in the world. In order for this all to occur, leaders will need to bridge and encourage connectivity. Good leaders will work well within their respective tribes, but we’ve seen that truly great leaders are those who are able to consort with disparate groups in order to achieve. They need to be thinking outside the tribe.
There has been a wealth of information and theory put forth recently on the universality of tribal characteristics. Seth Godin has written a powerful book, Tribes - We Need You to Lead Us, that addresses the dynamics of leadership in the context of tribalism. Members of the related Triiibes network (of which I am one) recently put together an E-book that explained what we have learned about all things tribal (you can download it for free here).
Great leaders are emerging now who have passion and the skills needed to make a difference. Bold, somewhat heretical moves will ensure not only a following, but innovative solutions. While we all can’t be President of the United States (and who really would want to?), we can use the characteristics of a good tribal leader to make a difference in our own sphere of influence. We can make better families, better companies, better communities, and better selves. What do we need to consider?
Tribal instincts are strong. Everyone wants to be part of something. It’s in our genetic make-up. People have tribed since they’ve walked the earth. The affiliation with a tribe serves to appropriate the attributes of the tribe and use them to extend our own influence. We take on tribal beliefs because they strengthen our own beliefs and address our fears by reducing them.
Tribal benefits are powerful. The benefit from tribes is that non-tribal members associate us with tribal characteristics and assign credibility to us. The feeling of belonging has deep psychological benefits. Belonging fosters fulfillment, stability, satisfaction, unity, and a sense of contribution. We need to feel valued and important to others.
While anonymity is appealing in some ways, to be constantly anonymous devalues our self-worth. When someone acknowledges our humanity, even by something as simple as knowing what drink we like, it reinforces … our sense of belonging. - Melinda Messineo
Tribes can splinter when priorities compete. In humanity’s earliest days, we hunted for food. Successful tribes had strong hunters, and non-hunting members sought the tribe with the most food. Well-fed non-hunters drew pictures on the cave walls. And, as a friend of ours recently put, “Then someone decided the pictures should hold the same value as the meat someone dragged home, and you had two extremely pissed off factions, because neither felt appreciated.”
Rival tribes co-exist in parallel. For three years within every U.S. election cycle, liberals and conservatives manage to cohabit within the country’s borders. Then, just prior to the election, as the campaigns ramp up the intensity, an eruptive catalyst sparks a series of skirmishes. Recently, the cease-fire has barely held post-election. Political leaders within each tribe connect intermittently with the rival tribe, but a divide is in place.
Strong leaders appeal to more than one tribe. Webs of tribes coalesce and unite, then disassociate again. Even when unification has occurred the need to separate and identify differences will still surface. Like individual Protestant denominations that meet to make doctrinal decisions and define policy, individual tribes will insist on a degree of autonomy within a coalition. We need to constantly know what we control and who the other is.
E pluribus unum. Out of many, one. - U.S. motto.
A greater, universal need has to emerge. Most of us were one after 9/11. Many of us wistfully reference that unity of spirit during the weeks after the tragedy. We united against a common threat, to right a wrong, to be part of something greater than ourselves. The civil rights movement was born out of similar elements and took on a life of its own.
External pressure to unify will meet resistance. The movement toward unification must appear to come from within. Pete and I learned this first-hand when we attempted to blend our families. Our teens and other family members were heavily vested in the status quo. Our wants did not translate into their needs. Obama will exhort and cajole his skeptics, but unless they decide themselves that the affiliation is of benefit to them and their tribe, nothing will happen. Should a unified effort be necessary to save the economy from more dire circumstances, or if there is a physical threat from outside our tribes, we’ll be all in. Dwight D. Eisenhower knew that good leadership “is the art of getting someone to do something you want done because he wants to do it.”
Successful tribal blending will acknowledge differences and identify commonalities. What can Obama, or any other leader, do to unite different tribes? A good leader will recognize that eliminating or minimizing tribal autonomy will not coerce cooperation. The difference in political success between the two super-powers - the United States and the Soviet Union - couldn’t be more stark. The Soviet Union failed because it held its consortium together by force, not by choice. Our teenagers didn’t feel they had sufficient choices, and so they resisted blending.
What is universally held? Our Declaration of Independence states, “We hold these truths to be self-evident,” and goes on to list them. Good leaders identify what is held in common, and speak to those precepts. Great leaders also realize individual needs and validate contributions with attention and rewards. They know that playing it safe is often the greatest risk of all in a changing world.
What needs to happen? Bold, dynamic moves framed within the context of common precepts will ensure progress, and might spark greatness. Abandon fear of failure and replace it with commitment. Embrace risk as a positive factor. Connections and ways of connecting need to be easy. Faith and passion, with tenacity, will make progress. Transparency will provide information and knowledge, and maintain authenticity. Choose progress and do what’s right.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=3035be97-fa71-41f2-b356-4a081acb0ade)


{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }
This is why I come here to read your words - you make me think.
We really do need to reach out, to offer our hands to each other in friendship, in assistance, to create something of real value and build the future together.
We are all part of the same big tribe - if we *don’t* reach out, then we are losing out.
-Brett
Brett Legree´s last blog post..week 2 - check up.
YES. Interconnected tribes, where everyone knows everyone else, are limited by Dunbar’s number (about 150 people a human can really empathize and connect with), but leaders can break through that barrier by inspiring thousands or even millions.
And how can I not get behind a message advocating authenticity? (:
Pace´s last blog post..We’re giving away the e-book and audio book for free!
I get kind of stuck on the word “tribe,” which doesn’t work for me. “Group” works a lot better. I think most of us already have groups in our lives that we work with and socialize with, but more would be helpful. We’ve reached the point where we stay indoors and use machines and electronics for entertainment, instead of working and playing with groups of people outside the home. However, it has now been reported that social networks online do lead to greater socialization offline, so I guess that’s a good thing.
I don’t believe that Obama or anyone else can change the ways that Washington works, but I do think that coalitions can be built that flow together on some issues and apart on others.
Dot´s last blog post..Blogcation
Great post as always Betsy! Can I expect to see you on the 2012 ticket? You’d have my vote!!!
Kathy @ Virtual Impax´s last blog post..Small Business Marketing Strategy & Tactics
@Dot: On pages 32-33 of this e-book (PDF) there’s an answer to the question “How is a tribe different from a fan base, a special interest group, or a community?”, and on pages 41-42 of there’s a discussion about “How can we talk about tribes without evoking visions of grass huts and tiki masks?”
I’m very interested in talking about tribes, groups, communities, and connection. In case you couldn’t tell. (:
Pace´s last blog post..We’re giving away the e-book and audio book for free!
The Soviet Union failed because it held its consortium together by force, not by choice. Our teenagers didn’t feel they had sufficient choices, and so they resisted blending.
did you mean the su teens didn’t feel they had sufficient choices?? if not, please elaborate.
I’m looking at this whole concept in a more generic lens than just our recent election. And, I think it fits with leadership, in general. Being a “tribe” has many positives - in connecting and unifying a group of people, and really bringing multiple “tribes” together to work toward a common goal. Kind of like in a company - and maybe the sales “tribe” and “manufacturing/distribution” tribe working together toward a common goal. Committed to doing what’s right… I like this concept…
Lance´s last blog post..Sunday Thought For The Day
Hi Betsy - this was really interesting. I never thought of the concept of tribes being applied to blended families. I will need to read Seth’s book.
As you say, you can only encourage folks to join a tribe, or the merging of tribes if you empower them to make their own contributions and make sure those contributions are recognised.
Total off topic - but hilarious - I don’t know where it is over there, but from where I’m searching, I’m on the front page of Google for “best ass on the internet” and other related terms, for the post with your winning pic. It may be different on yours. I know when Barbara has searched some of the same things as me, she’s got different results.
Hi Brett - If you’re going to be a great leader, it’s imperative to appeal to more than your own tribe. By finessing the bridging that’s necessary and keeping the need for autonomy in mind, great coalitions can form.
Hi Pace - Fellow Triiiber, thank you for adding clarification and validating!
Hi Dot - I agree that making inroads into established patterns is extremely difficult, in Washington and throughout the world. Also, there is the aspect of ignoring his (supposed?) tribe in his Cabinet appointments. The left is keeping a lid on their reaction to the centrism there, for now. Hope you’ll read the e-book and think about the explanatory elements in there. Whatever you call a tribe, it is.
Hi Kathy - I have a far too sordid past to ever consider running for office, but thank you for the compliment!
Hi r - Welcome! I referred to our teenagers in the paragraph previous to the one you quoted. Sorry if I didn’t transition well, but I was definitely referring to Pete’s and my teenagers. I can only speculate on the frustrations teens must have felt in the former Soviet Union. Thanks.
Hi Lance - Yes, exactly, the generic lens. The easy examples have to do with the election, but the universality of tribal alliances and behaviors mean that we can use knowledge and build upon the good.
Hi Cath - The tribes concept can be applied to businesses, families, any group dynamic where there is a buy-in. Hilarious on the ass thing. They are clicking on the photo, too, because you’ve been our top referrer for several days now!
I just got the book downloaded on my kindle but could not read it on the train in the darkness I meditated through!….I felt kind of weird growing up as my parents emigrated to this country via Canada…and I was the only US born citizen in my family…and they considered themselves superior educators…but friends at school thought I was just strange and liked my parent’s accents….I truly never felt like I belonged to a group or tribe…I was always on the edge - observing. Maybe that is the tribe of writers?
Patricia´s last blog post..Chug, Chug, Toot, Toot
This is a very powerful post. I really love the tribal benefit of feeling a sense of belonging. I love communal living for similar benefits (sense of fulfillment, stability, satisfaction, unity, and a sense of contribution).
Stacey / Create a Balance´s last blog post..Life Balance Quotes
Hi Patricia - I believe, yes, what you described as “observing” is a key characteristic in the tribe of writers. I’ve felt that myself, noticing things that other people didn’t and wondering, how could they not? I also believe if you separate geography from the answer to the question, “Where is home?” you will identify your tribe. Thank you.
Hi Stacey - It is a powerful concept, isn’t it? I like that it’s getting buzz, because if more people understand it, it seems to me the more understanding there will be. Thanks!
Hi Betsy - I love the quote from Dwight D. Eisenhower. It makes me wonder if Obama is reading about him. Can you imagine if he learned that good leadership “is the art of getting someone to do something you want done because he wants to do it.”? How great would that be?
I hear you when you speak of blended families. Being a step mother to four, those early years were a real test. Thank goodness the kids are grown and those “tribal” trials are over.
Barbara Swafford - Blogging Without A Blog´s last blog post..The Unseen Benefit of Commenting
Hi Barbara - Yes, old “Ike” sure knew how to combine disparate tribes, didn’t he? One just has to think of the build-up to D-Day. All those competing egos with his generals must’ve been like herding cats!
And yes, I’m waiting for the day…I can *almost* see the sunrise on the horizon as the kids get older.